Terms of Service
Last updated 2026-08-01 · v2026-08-01.1
Αυτή η σελίδα δεν έχει μεταφραστεί ακόμη στα Ελληνικά, γι’ αυτό εμφανίζεται στα Αγγλικά.
Draft — not yet reviewed by a lawyer
The descriptions of how this service works are accurate. The legal conclusions have not been checked by anyone qualified to check them, and this must not be relied on as it stands.
1. Who we are, and what this agreement covers
Angie Eats operates an ordering platform. Restaurants list their menus on it, you place orders through it, and we arrange for those orders to reach you. These terms govern your use of the platform and the orders you place through it.
These terms are published in English only. There is no Greek version, and we will not machine translate one, because a contract in a second jurisdiction that no lawyer has read is a liability rather than a convenience. If you are ordering in Greece, Greek consumer law applies to you regardless of the language this document is written in, and nothing here reduces it.
Needs a qualified lawyer: Confirm the contracting entity, its registration number and registered address, per market. This document does not yet name a legal entity because the platform does not yet record one. A consumer contract that does not identify the trader is defective under both the Consumer Rights Directive (Art. 6) and California law.
2. Who sells the food
The restaurant makes the food and sells it to you. It decides what is on its menu, what is in each dish, how it is prepared, and whether it can meet a request you make. We do not cook, we hold no recipes, and everything shown about what is in a dish is the restaurant's own statement rather than anything we have checked. Section 8 says more about that, and it matters more than anything else in this document.
We are not a passive noticeboard, and we do not claim to be one. We display the menu, we set the price you are shown, we take your payment, we may arrange the delivery, and we handle refunds. Where something goes wrong with any of those things, it is ours.
For card orders we are the party that takes the money. Your card is charged by Angie Eats, your receipt comes from Angie Eats, and we pay the restaurant afterwards. In the United States this also means we are generally the "marketplace facilitator" for sales tax purposes and collect and remit it. That is a real difference from a platform that merely introduces you to a restaurant, and we would rather state it than have it discovered.
Needs a qualified lawyer: This is the clause the whole document turns on. Confirm the split is drafted consistently with (a) the Adyen configuration actually in production at launch, (b) the marketplace-facilitator registrations, and (c) the merchant agreement, which must allocate the same risks the same way. If splits are ever enabled (ADYEN_SPLIT_ENABLED) so that money lands in the restaurant's balance account rather than ours, this clause changes.
3. The price you are shown is the price you pay
Every price on the platform is calculated by our own pricing code at the moment you are shown it, and the same code runs again when your order is placed. The total you confirm at checkout is the total we charge. If they ever differ, the lower one stands and we will refund the difference without asking you to.
Menu prices on the platform may be higher than the price the same restaurant charges if you walk in or telephone. We add a margin to the menu price, and that margin is part of what pays for the platform. Fees for service and delivery, and tax, are shown separately before you pay.
No part of pricing is decided by an artificial intelligence model, and prices are not personalised to you. We do not charge one customer more than another for the same basket at the same restaurant at the same time. See the Automated Processing notice for why that is an architectural property rather than a promise.
4. Placing an order, and when the contract is made
When you confirm an order you are making an offer. The contract is formed when the restaurant accepts it, which is normally within a few minutes. If no restaurant accepts, no contract is formed and any hold on your card is released.
You do not need an account to order. If you scan a code at a table, or check out as a guest, you are agreeing to these terms at the moment you confirm the order and not before. We will not put a consent screen between you and a cup of coffee.
We keep a record of which version of these terms was in force when you ordered. If we change them, your past orders remain governed by the version that was published when you placed them.
Needs a qualified lawyer: US enforceability: on Berman v. Freedom Financial (9th Cir. 2022), Chabolla v. ClassPass (9th Cir. 2025) and Cruz v. Tapestry (Cal. Ct. App. 2025), a guest food-order checkout is close to the paradigm case where terms are held NOT to bind. PARTLY ANSWERED SINCE THIS WAS WRITTEN, and the note is corrected rather than deleted because what changed is a fact about the software. Built: a conspicuous button-adjacent notice naming the exact button label ("By pressing “Place order”…"), in body text at body size rather than grey small print, linking the EXACT version on screen at its permanent URL; and an acceptance row per order in `legal_acceptances` carrying the version and a SHA-256 of the text, refused rather than reconciled if the version moved between render and submit. Both placement endpoints REQUIRE the displayed version, so an order cannot be placed without one. See App\Domain\Legal\ConsumerAssent, web/src/components/order-assent.tsx and tests/Feature/ConsumerAssentTest.php. All THREE consumer placement paths are covered: POST /customer/orders, POST /guest/orders and POST /customer/group-baskets/{basket}/checkout. Staff-placed phone orders are deliberately not, because there is no screen the caller reads. STILL FOR COUNSEL: (1) whether a notice-plus-button is sufficient in the target states or whether an affirmative tick is wanted, which is a conversion decision as much as a legal one; (2) there is still no browser guest checkout at all — the guest endpoint is reached by the customer app and by a restaurant's embed, and the app now shows and sends the version, but an embed that does not is an order this clause should not be relied on for.
5. Cancelling, and what happens if something goes wrong
You can cancel before the restaurant accepts your order and you will not be charged. After a restaurant has accepted and started cooking, cancellation is at the restaurant's discretion, because the food has been made.
If the kitchen never picks up your order, our system cancels it and refunds you automatically, without you having to ask and without anybody having to decide. That is our failure, not the restaurant's, and it is treated as ours.
If the food is wrong, missing, or not what was described, tell us. Where the problem is with the food itself we will normally refund you and recover the cost from the restaurant. Where the problem is with the platform or the delivery, we carry it.
6. Your right to change your mind — Greece and the EU
Greece and the EU only
The 14-day right of withdrawal for distance contracts does not apply to food prepared and delivered to order. That is not our rule: Article 16 of the Consumer Rights Directive (2011/83/EU) excludes goods liable to deteriorate rapidly and services already performed.
Everything else in Greek and EU consumer law does apply, in full, and nothing in these terms reduces it. That includes your rights where goods are not as described, the prohibition on unfair contract terms under Directive 93/13/EEC, and your right to bring a claim in the courts of the place where you live.
If we cannot resolve a complaint between us, you may use an out-of-court dispute resolution body. We will name the body we participate in before launch in Greece.
Needs a qualified lawyer: Two open items. (1) Greece requires a named ADR/ODR entity for consumer disputes; identify it and insert. (2) Confirm the Art. 16(d)/(m) analysis for scheduled orders placed days in advance, which is arguably a different case from immediate delivery.
7. What we are responsible for, and what we are not
We are responsible for the platform working, for charging you the amount you agreed, for refunding you when we say we will, and for handling your personal data properly. Where we fail at any of those, we are liable for the loss that failure causes.
The restaurant is responsible for the food: what is in it, how it is made, whether it is safe, and whether it matches its description. We do not verify any of that, and we say so plainly rather than burying it.
We do not exclude or limit our liability for death or personal injury caused by our negligence, for fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation, or for anything else which the law does not allow us to exclude. Any attempt to do so would be void, and in the EU an unfair term is frequently struck out in full rather than read down — which would leave us with less protection, not more.
Beyond those, and to the extent the law allows, we are not liable for loss that was not reasonably foreseeable, for business losses, or for the acts of a restaurant in preparing food.
Needs a qualified lawyer: DELIBERATELY NOT DRAFTED AS A CAP. A monetary cap ("liability shall not exceed the value of the order") was considered and left out. In California, New England Country Foods v. VanLaw (Cal. 2025, 17 Cal.5th 703) holds that Civ. Code s.1668 invalidates clauses that merely LIMIT damages for wilful injury, not only those that exclude them; and UCC s.2-719(3) makes limiting consequential damages for personal injury from consumer goods prima facie unconscionable, with food expressly a sale of goods under s.2-314(1). Counsel to decide whether a cap confined to economic loss, with personal injury carved out, is worth having in each market.
8. Allergies and dietary requirements
We do not hold recipes or ingredient lists for any dish. What we hold is what the restaurant has told us: free-from labels it has ticked, and, for each of the nine major allergens, its own answer of "contains", "does not contain", or nothing at all. Every one of those is the restaurant's statement. We do not check any of them, we do not inspect kitchens, and we do not test food.
Where a restaurant has not answered, we say so in those words and show you which allergens it has not answered for. A missing answer is not a statement that a dish contains an allergen and it is not a statement that it does not.
We cannot tell you that any dish is safe for you, and we will never say that. Tell the restaurant about your allergy directly. If you record an allergy with us it is sent to the kitchen with your order, and the restaurant is the only party who knows what is in the food and how it is prepared.
The Allergen and Dietary Notice sets this out in full, and our ordering assistant shows you the same words before it suggests anything. They are the same words on purpose.
9. Alcohol, age and restricted items
Where a restaurant sells alcohol or another age-restricted item through the platform, you must be old enough to buy it where you are, and you may be asked to prove it at handover. The person handing it over may refuse, and if they refuse you may still be charged for it.
Needs a qualified lawyer: UNVERIFIED AGAINST CODE. No age-verification mechanism was found in the codebase. Either build one before listing alcohol in either market, or remove this clause and do not list age-restricted items. Greek and US state licensing rules differ substantially and both bite on the platform, not only the restaurant.
10. Changing these terms
We may change these terms. When we do, we publish a new version with its own date, and the old version stays available at its own address so you can see what you agreed to.
A change never applies backwards. Orders you have already placed are governed by the version in force when you placed them.
We do not treat continued use of the platform as agreement to a materially worse term. Where a change materially affects your rights we will ask you again rather than assume.
Needs a qualified lawyer: The clause deliberately avoids "we may change these terms at any time and continued use constitutes acceptance". On Douglas v. US District Court (9th Cir. 2007), Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind v. Container Store (1st Cir. 2018) and Stover v. Experian (9th Cir. 2020) that formulation can render the whole agreement illusory — including any arbitration clause — and severance does not cure it because the defect goes to formation.
11. Law and disputes — United States
United States only
For orders placed in the United States, these terms are governed by the law of the state in which the order was delivered or collected.
Nothing in these terms waives any right you have under a state consumer protection statute, and any purported waiver of such a right is void.
Needs a qualified lawyer: No arbitration clause, no class-action waiver and no forum selection clause has been drafted. That is a commercial decision, not an oversight, and it is the owner's: an arbitration clause is the single most valuable term a US delivery platform has, and its absence is very likely why no delivery platform has yet generated an appellate food-injury precedent. If one is wanted it must be drafted alongside a compliant clickwrap (clause 4) and must not bar public injunctive relief in California (McGill v. Citibank, 393 P.3d 85 (Cal. 2017)).
12. Law and disputes — Greece and the EU
Greece and the EU only
For orders placed in Greece, Greek law applies and you may bring proceedings in the courts of the place where you live. Nothing in these terms deprives you of the protection of mandatory rules of the law of your country of residence.
13. Contacting us
Support requests, complaints and legal notices all reach us at the addresses published on the platform. A complaint about an order is answered by a person.
Needs a qualified lawyer: Insert the actual registered address, support email and legal notice address per market before publication. DSA Art. 11-12 additionally require a single electronic point of contact for authorities AND for recipients of the service, published and identified as such.
9 clauses on this page carry a note above because they need a qualified lawyer. They are published rather than hidden: a reader is better served by an open question than by a confident answer that is wrong.
sha256 9d6297b7c72acdd9eaf58d6b6900a39ce4a4cdf56c1100d3f89f18e96726ac58